HomeAll politicians

hippo-cricket.com

James E Risch

Republican · Senator · ID

ID Senate · 2026 ballot

Photo: U.S. Congress Bioguide

Fat Hippo

  • HippoCricket 0.8%Changed and went silent
  • Hippo 0.1%Changed but explained why
  • Fat Hippo 30.9%Never changed
  • Thin Hippo 68.2%No votes yet

The same bar for every politician on the site. Each part is that group's share of everyone here. The mark shows which group James E Risch is in.

Pond picture: Fat Hippo. A fat hippo across the whole pond. Never changed.

Voted yes or no on 7 of the 8 issues.

Never changed.

This file is claimable. Votes, pond, and PAC totals stay. You get a why box. Silence is still a cricket. Own it

not left vs right · money never moves the pond

Stack of bills on a photo = they took PAC money that funded both parties. Not the pond.

What they report · Where they serve · not the pond

Reported assets
At least $20,446,034 (range $20,446,034–$92,240,000)
2025 Senate financial disclosure, lowest value of each band, summed. Official report ↗
Median household income, Idaho
$77,800 (±$743)
Census ACS 2020–2024 5-year estimate. Census table ↗

26,280% of the Idaho median

The income bar shows the median as a share of the larger of the two figures, with a 3px minimum width so it stays visible. The assets bar has its own scale, from $1 at the left to $20 million at the right, and follows the low end of the range. It fills completely when the top of the range is over $20 million. Its color, and the color of the percentage above, runs from green on the left to red on the right.

Reported assets are what the disclosure form lists, in value bands, before debts and not counting a primary home. The median is one year's household income. They measure different things.

Context only. The income figure never moves the pond.

How they voted · the eight · not the pond

Latest roll call per issue, shown as the stance it supports. A NO counts as the other side. The line under each label is the exact vote.

Screenshot the card. Every line is sourced on this page. Money never moves the pond.

About James E Risch

Age
83 (born May 3, 1943)source
Born in
Milwaukee, Wisconsinsource
Years in office
U.S. Senate since Jan 6, 2009 · 17 years.source
Hobbies & fun facts
Says hunting is his favorite outdoor activity, especially elk hunting.Source: Roll Call, 2016

Lawyer raised in Milwaukee; moved to Idaho in the early 1960s. University of Idaho B.S. in forestry (1965) and J.D. (1968). Taught criminal law at Boise State; Ada County prosecuting attorney from 1970; later Idaho lieutenant governor and briefly governor.

Last updated: Oct 19, 2026

For context only. These details never change the pond.

What they're running on

From their campaign site, in their own words. Not the pond.

  • No official platform found.

Also on the record — not in the pond

Votes and disclosures. A single vote here doesn't change the pond. A checked flip on any bill is listed in the Flips section.

Next election · not the pond

Nov 3, 2026 · ID Senate · General election · On the ballot

Federal general elections are the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. Not the pond.

Government salary

$174,000

2026 pay for the office. Set by law. Not the pond.

Reported assets · not the pond

James E Risch: 2025 Senate financial disclosure, lowest value of each band, summed (Official report ↗).

Reported assets. Not the pond.
James E RischAt least $20,446,034 (range $20,446,034–$92,240,000)

Scale zero to $10,000,000.

Committee assignments · not the pond

Current committees and subcommittees. Shown so you can see it. Committees never move the pond.

  • Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources — Member

    Subcommittee: Energy — Member

    Subcommittee: Public Lands, Forests, and Mining — Member

    Subcommittee: Water and Power — Member

  • Senate Committee on Foreign Relations — Chair

    Subcommittee: Africa and Global Health Policy — Ex officio

    Subcommittee: East Asia, the Pacific, and International Cybersecurity Policy — Ex officio

    Subcommittee: Europe and Regional Security Cooperation — Ex officio

    Subcommittee: Multilateral International Development, Multilateral Institutions, and International Economic, Energy, and Environmental Policy — Ex officio

    Subcommittee: Near East, South Asia, Central Asia, and Counterterrorism — Ex officio

    Subcommittee: State Department and USAID Management, International Operations, and Bilateral International Development — Ex officio

    Subcommittee: Western Hemisphere, Transnational Crime, Civilian Security, Democracy, Human Rights, and Global Women's Issues — Ex officio

  • Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship — Member

  • Senate Select Committee on Ethics — Member

  • Senate Select Committee on Intelligence — Member

  • United States Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control — Member

Source: unitedstates/congress-legislators, pulled Oct 20, 2026.

Funding — not the pond

FEC money track · 2024–2026 cycle · never part of the pond

Did they take money from PACs that funded both Democrats and Republicans? Money never moves the pond.

Campaign — they cashed it

$107,500 TAKE (dual-party PAC)

Took at least $1,000 from PACs that fund both parties.

Context. Not the pond. Taking the check is not a flip. Flipping after the check, and staying quiet, is.

Own it — Dual-party PAC

The office types a why in their own words after opening the mailbox link. It does not move the pond.

Largest dual-party PACs on this file.

  • UBS AMERICAS INC.$10,000
  • BHFS-E, PC PAC (BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE)$5,000
  • AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TRAVEL ADVISORS, INC.$5,000

Traditional PAC contributions to candidate committees only. A dual-party PAC gave at least $1,000 to both parties. AIPAC in this table is committee C00797670. Legal, disclosed, hard-capped. Super PACs and dark money are not in this number. Taking this money is common. The amount is the story. HippoCricket doesn't put this in the pond. FEC bulk committee-to-candidate (24K/24Z), cycles 2024+2026. Dual-party = PAC gave ≥$1,000 to Dems and ≥$1,000 to Republicans. AIPAC = C00797670 only. Download the PAC table.

Stock trading

  • S.Amdt. 1481 to S. 2038 — Brown amendment to prohibit financial conflicts of interest

    What this was: Would have forced senators to sell individual stocks and dump conflicts of interest. Failed 26–73.

    Senate · 2012

    Force divestiture. Failed. Rejected 26–73, February 2, 2012.

    Nay
    Official roll call

Bills they sponsored · floor outcomes · not the pond

Bills and joint resolutions they sponsored since 2015 that passed or failed in a chamber. Sponsor only. Shown so you can see it. Bills never move the pond.

Sponsored 187 since 2015. 2 became law. 1 passed a chamber and did not become law. 0 failed a floor vote.

  • S. 2160 (118th Congress) — Urban Canal Modernization Act

    A bill to amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to authorize certain extraordinary operation and maintenance work for urban canals of concern.

    Introduced Jun 22, 2023 · Passed Senate Dec 19, 2024 · Official record ↗

  • S. 1617 (117th Congress) — Disaster Assistance for Rural Communities Act

    Introduced May 13, 2021 · Became law Dec 20, 2022 (Public Law 117-249) · Official record ↗

  • S. 3119 (115th Congress) — Endangered Salmon Predation Prevention Act

    Introduced Jun 21, 2018 · Became law Dec 18, 2018 (Public Law 115-329) · Official record ↗

Source: GovInfo BILLSTATUS (Library of Congress actions), pulled Oct 20, 2026. Provisions passed inside other bills are not counted.

Where they stand on the eight

A sourced vote always wins. Nothing is guessed.

  • Immigration & Border SecuritySupportedNo flipStricter enforcement and border controls
  • AbortionSupportedNo flipPro-life / restricting abortion
  • Gun Rights & Second AmendmentOpposedNo flipOpposition to the restriction
  • Free Speech & CensorshipNo sourced recordNo sourced record
  • Taxes, Spending & DebtSupportedNo flipLower taxes and tax cuts
  • Energy PolicySupportedNo flipExpanded domestic and fossil-fuel production
  • Crime & PolicingNayNo flip
  • Parental Rights & School ChoiceSupportedNo flipVoted Yea. Would let 529 accounts cover K–12 tuition, not just college.

Votes with own party

92% of the time — 12 of 13 roll calls on this page went with the rest of the Republican caucus.

Fat Hippo is whether they stay themselves. This is whether they stay with the party. Doesn't touch the pond.

Why this pond: No flip on the file. Never changed. The landmark votes are shown below.

We show what they said and what they did. The verdict is yours.

0
Recorded flips
0
Explained
0
Unexplained

Stance timeline by issue

Flips first

Each line is a sourced position. One banner is one flip on a landmark issue. Flips on other bills are listed in the Flips section, and Recorded flips counts both.

On the record — not in the pond

Iran War Powers Current events

On the record — not in the pond

  • Jun 23, 2026 Voted Nay — H.Con.Res. 86 — direct removal of U.S. forces from Iran Official roll call
  • Sep 24, 2026 Voted Nay — H.Con.Res. 89 — direct removal of U.S. forces from Iran Official roll call

Shown only. Doesn't touch the pond.

Healthcare Health

On the record — not in the pond

No sourced vote or statement recorded yet.

Shown only. Doesn't touch the pond.

Women's Sports Eligibility Education

On the record — not in the pond

No sourced vote or statement recorded yet.

Shown only. Doesn't touch the pond.

Artificial intelligence regulation Technology

On the record — not in the pond

No sourced vote or statement recorded yet.

Shown only. Doesn't touch the pond.

Voting rights and election rules Elections

On the record — not in the pond

No sourced vote or statement recorded yet.

Shown only. Doesn't touch the pond.

Term limits Congress

On the record — not in the pond

  • Feb 2, 2012 Voted Nay — DeMint amendment: sense of the Senate for congressional term limitsShown, not in the pond. Official roll call

Shown only. Doesn't touch the pond.

Age limits for federal officials Congress

On the record — not in the pond

No sourced vote or statement recorded yet.

Shown only. Doesn't touch the pond.

Presidential immunity / accountability Presidency

On the record — not in the pond

No sourced vote or statement recorded yet.

Shown only. Doesn't touch the pond.

Abortion Social Policy

0 explained · 0 unexplained

  1. Feb 25, 2020 Supported Vote

    Supported: Pro-life / restricting abortion

    Voted Yea — Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act (20-week)

    On Passage

    What this was: Would ban most abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, with limited exceptions.

    ↗ senate.gov
  2. Feb 25, 2020 Supported Vote

    Supported: Pro-life / restricting abortion

    Voted Yea — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act

    On Passage

    What this was: Requires doctors to give an infant born alive after an attempted abortion the same care any other newborn would get, with penalties for failing to do so.

    ↗ senate.gov
  3. May 11, 2022 Supported Vote

    Supported: Pro-life / restricting abortion

    Voted Nay — Women's Health Protection Act (codify Roe)

    On Passage

    What this was: Would write a federal right to abortion into statute and block many state limits, roughly locking in Roe v. Wade nationwide.

    ↗ senate.gov
  4. Jan 22, 2025 Supported Vote

    Supported: Pro-life / restricting abortion

    Voted Yea — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act

    On Passage

    What this was: Requires doctors to give an infant born alive after an attempted abortion the same care any other newborn would get, with penalties for failing to do so.

    ↗ senate.gov

Crime & Policing Justice

0 explained · 0 unexplained

  1. Dec 18, 2018 Nay Vote

    Voted Nay — First Step Act

    On Passage

    What this was: 2018 prison-reform law. Cuts some federal mandatory minimums, expands early-release credits, and eases a few sentencing rules. Trump signed it.

    ↗ senate.gov

Energy Policy Environment

0 explained · 0 unexplained

  1. Jan 29, 2015 Supported Vote

    Supported: Expanded domestic and fossil-fuel production

    Voted Yea — Keystone XL Pipeline Approval Act

    On Passage

    What this was: Would approve the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada. A signature energy vote.

    ↗ senate.gov

Gun Rights & Second Amendment Civil Rights

0 explained · 0 unexplained

  1. Apr 17, 2013 Opposed Shown, not in the pond.

    Opposed: Opposition to the restriction

    Voted Nay — Manchin-Toomey expanded background checks

    On Passage

    What this was: Would require a federal background check on nearly all gun sales, including private sales and gun shows.

    ↗ senate.gov
  2. Jun 23, 2022 Opposed Vote

    Opposed: Opposition to the restriction

    Voted Nay — Bipartisan Safer Communities Act

    On Passage

    What this was: 2022 gun-and-mental-health package after Uvalde. Extra checks for buyers under 21, money for state red-flag laws, closes the “boyfriend loophole,” and school/mental-health funding.

    ↗ senate.gov

Immigration & Border Security Immigration

0 explained · 0 unexplained

  1. Jun 27, 2013 Supported Shown, not in the pond.

    Supported: Stricter enforcement and border controls

    Voted Nay — S.744 Gang of Eight / path to citizenship

    On Passage

    What this was: 2013 comprehensive immigration bill. Border security triggers plus a path to citizenship. Not the same measure as 2025 detention bills.

    ↗ senate.gov
  2. Jan 20, 2025 Supported Vote

    Supported: Stricter enforcement and border controls

    Voted Yea — Laken Riley Act (S.5)

    On Passage

    What this was: Named after Laken Riley, murdered by a man in the country illegally. Requires ICE to detain illegal immigrants charged with theft, burglary, assault on police, or a crime that kills or badly injures someone. H.R. 29 and S. 5 are the same detention bill. The House voted on it twice in January 2025. The Senate version became law.

    ↗ senate.gov

Parental Rights & School Choice Education

0 explained · 0 unexplained

  1. Dec 1, 2017 Supported Vote

    Supported: Voted Yea. Would let 529 accounts cover K–12 tuition, not just college.

    Voted Yea — Cruz 529 / K-12 education accounts amendment

    On Passage

    What this was: Would let 529 education accounts cover K–12 tuition, not just college.

    ↗ senate.gov

Taxes, Spending & Debt Economy

0 explained · 0 unexplained

  1. Dec 2, 2017 Supported Vote

    Supported: Lower taxes and tax cuts

    Voted Yea — Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

    On Passage

    What this was: 2017 Republican tax law. Cut individual and corporate rates, doubled the standard deduction, capped SALT. Trump signed it.

    ↗ senate.gov
  2. Aug 7, 2022 Supported Vote

    Supported: Lower taxes and tax cuts

    Voted Nay — Inflation Reduction Act

    On Passage

    What this was: Climate and energy tax credits, a 15% corporate minimum tax, IRS funding, and Medicare drug-price negotiation. Paid for in part by new taxes; Democrats framed it as deficit reduction.

    ↗ senate.gov

Claim this profile

This does not take the file. Nothing changes until it is reviewed.

Unclaimed

Submissions are reviewed before anything changes. We’ll reply from file@hippo-cricket.com.

Challenge this record

This is a real filing. No source, no change.

Submissions are reviewed before they appear.

We’ll reply from file@hippo-cricket.com.

Read our Privacy and Terms.

Respond to this record

For the office or staff. This does not change the pond or a vote.

Submissions are reviewed before they appear. We’ll reply from file@hippo-cricket.com.

Also on the record

Roll calls we show but never put in the pond. These are separate questions, so they are never counted against each other and never move the pond.

Earmarks

  • S.Amdt. 1472 to S. 2038 — Toomey amendment to prohibit earmarks

    What this was: Would have banned earmarks. Failed 40–59. Yea = ban earmarks.

    Senate · 2012

    Rejected 40–59, February 2, 2012. Yea = ban earmarks.

    Yea
    Official roll call

Term limits

  • S.Amdt. 1488 to S. 2038 — DeMint amendment on congressional term limits

    What this was: Would have added congressional term limits. Failed 24–75.

    Senate · 2012

    Rejected 24–75, February 2, 2012.

    Nay
    Official roll call

Profile checkers — not the pond

Four automated checks on the same file and the same rules. They can split.

Not four bots googling him. Four jobs on the same sourced votes. They don’t see party, PAC money, or who you like. They can split. The roll calls on this page are the backup — not the names on this card.

  • Grok

    the flips

    Fat Hippo

    No flip on the file under the same-question rule. Fat Hippo: never changed.

  • Claude

    the why

    Fat Hippo

    Nothing to explain. The positions line up with themselves.

  • Gemini

    the file

    Fat Hippo

    16 sourced votes. 7 of the 8. Thick enough for Fat Hippo.

  • ChatGPT

    the voter

    Fat Hippo

    Same answers on the same questions. Nothing in this file would surprise a voter who already knew them.

4 of 4 landed on Fat Hippo. Different jobs. Same read.

How the checkers work · They never see who you like.